|
发表于 2011-1-21 23:11
|
显示全部楼层
来自: 中国上海
SOLAS2009新的是要求用screw-down型式的阀,一般而言如果是小口径的阀用小轴传动装置在主甲板上操作,而一般如果大口径的就的用液压的型式了,现在大多数设计都是用的液压蝶阀,多数船级社是认可的,但是就这一问题存在很大的争议,老的SOLAS里面强调的是suitable valve而新的明确了screw-down,并且现状是大多数船用液压的蝶阀并没有出现什么大的问题。就这个问题IMO和IACS都没有出过官方的解释只有IMO下面的SUB-COMMITTEE ON STABILITY AND LOAD LINES AND ON FISHING VESSELS SAFETY 有过一个解释:
Discussions on valve type
5 Considering the following situations, IACS can not find a strong reason to prohibit the
use of butterfly valves for this purpose.
(1) Butterfly valves have been widely used for this purpose and no serious casualties
caused by a damage or failure of the valve have been reported.
(2) Piping is usually designed so that progressive flooding through it cannot occur by
a single damage or failure. For example, ballast piping is fitted with valves at the
pump side and the boundaries of each tank, if served for other tanks.
(3) Butterfly valves have been widely used in overboard discharge pipes, which are
required to have more stringent integrity.
(4) Valves of other types having larger sizes necessary for tank operations of larger
ships are not available in the market.
(5) IACS is not aware of any record/evidence of discussion justifying the change of
requirements noted in paragraph 2, above. SLF 51/3/4 - 4 -
6 Accordingly, IACS considers that, unless some justification for the use of screw-down
valves can be provided, butterfly valves provide a means as effective as a screw-down valve to
ensure the integrity of pipes piercing the shipís collision bulkhead below the bulkhead deck.
51-3-4.pdf
(162.68 KB, 下载次数: 116)
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|