各位高手,帮我翻译下面两段吧
Naval ships, especially true naval combatants, differ from merchant ships, both in how they are designed and how the naval ship design process differs significantly from that appropriate to their merchant cousins. The Naval Ship Safety Regime was formalized in the U.K. Ministry of Defence (MoD) while the author was the lead safety director in the surface ship area1. The principal features of that regime consist of a Ship Safety Management System (SSMS), a Ship Safety Case, the Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) Process and the Key Hazards.
Of the significant developments in the subsequent six years, the most noticeable has been the introduction into the acquisition process of most major navies of Naval Ship Classification, following the pioneering work by the U.K.MoD. The key points of this approach, together with the associated aspects of such a regime, are the specific notation approach it requires and the need for specifying the aspects of, what has been designated, Military Distinction in ship classification. An associated issue, with a major bearing on naval ship safety, is that of Design Authority (DA), given the general trend for even major combatants to no longer be designed ‘in-house’. The safety aspects of this development can be seen in the specific example of the U.K. Type 45 Destroyer procurement. |