查看: 1692|回复: 8
收起左侧

[其他] 审图适用的规范

[复制链接]
发表于 2013-1-3 11:29 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式 来自: 中国福建福州
审图时,该船所使用的规范是根据什么来审的?我主要是指规范的时效问题,比如说2000年造的船,2012年才交船,适用什么时候的船级社规范呢?是否RFC中会提到该规范?
回复

使用道具 举报

龙船学院
头像被屏蔽
发表于 2013-1-3 11:35 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国湖北黄冈
2000年规范
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-3 11:37 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国福建福州
whlinjiwu 发表于 2013-1-3 11:35
2000年规范

如果我是2000年初才造的船呢?而实际设计应是更早,比如说是99年5月份。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-1-3 12:32 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国上海
本帖最后由 hugh777 于 2013-1-3 12:37 编辑

这个“规范要求”应分两部分:法定部分和船级部分。

就法定部分而言,主要是指法定规范(公约或船旗国法规)的适用要求。这个规范要求很严格,并且在不断地更新。故会在船舶的设计合同中有预见性地确定下来。所谓“预见性地”确定的法规就是指“在该船设计建造的时间段,可能生效或即将生效的法规”。毕竟,法规的生效不是毫无征兆的,都会有一个预备期的。但最终的适用法规的确定是靠船舶的建造合同何时签署,或者“处于相似建造阶段”为准,在签署之日还没有生效的法规就不被纳入了。

就生效日期而言,船级部分的规范要求相对来说就没那么的严密了。毕竟这是船级社的规范,两个不同年份的规范对某船的要求可能完全一致的。只要船级社说“该船已经满足了我船级社对XXX船级标志的要求了”便是了。所以,在确定船舶的设计和建造要求时,常常以“某船级社入级标志或附加标志”为设计建造条件,而不应该刻意地强调“以船级社的哪一年规范为准”。

对于你说的这样的船舶,尽管建造时间过长,但法定部分的要求还是按照2000年签订合同时的法规要求,而不会附加上以后生效的法规的。除非法规在这个时间段有针对该船的追溯性要求。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-1-4 09:31 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国天津
一般情况下,船级社规范是以签订“建造合同”日期为准生效的,公约则是以“铺龙骨”日期生效的,有时候船东为了规避某个新生效的法规,常常提前制作一个分段,在法规生效前铺龙骨,但是有些公约为了防止这种情况,规定了最后交船日期,例如PSPC规定,无论何时铺龙骨,在2012年7月1日以后交船的都要满足PSPC要求。如果你仅想知道适用的船级社规范,回去查查签订的建造合同日期。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-4 20:37 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国福建福州
多谢各位的指点,大致了解了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-1-4 23:45 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国辽宁盘锦
1. For the purpose of defining the category of a ship under SOLAS regulation II-1/3-2, a ship for which the building contract (or keel laying) occurred, and scheduled delivery date was, before the dates specified in this regulation, but where the delivery has been subject to delay beyond the specific date due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the builder and the owner, may be accepted by the Administration as a ship delivered before the date of delivery specified in this regulation. The treatment of such ships should be considered by the Administration on a case by case basis, bearing in mind the particular circumstances.

2. It is important that ships accepted by the Administration under the provisions of paragraph 1 above should also be accepted as such by port States. In order to ensure this, the following practice is recommended to Administrations when considering an application for such a ship:

.1. the Administration should thoroughly consider applications on a case by case basis, bearing in mind the particular circumstances. In doing so in the case of a ship built in a foreign country, the Administration may require a formal report from the authorities of the country in which the ship was built, stating that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the builder and the owner;

.2. when a ship is accepted by the Administration under the provisions of paragraph 1 above, the delivery date annotated on the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate, Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or Cargo Ship Safety Certificate should be footnoted to indicate that the ship is accepted by the Administration under the unforeseen delay in delivery provisions of this interpretation; and

.3. the Administration should report to the Organization on the identity of the ship and the grounds on which the ship has been accepted under the unforeseen delay in delivery provisions of this interpretation.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-1-4 23:49 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国辽宁盘锦
1. Under certain provisions of the SOLAS and MARPOL Conventions, the application of regulations to a ship is governed by the dates:

.1. for which the building contract is placed on or after dd/mm/yyyy; or

.2. in the absence of a building contract, the keel of which is laid or which is at a similar stage of construction on or after dd/mm/yyyy; or

.3. the delivery of which is on or after dd/mm/yyyy.

2. For the application of such provisions, the date on which the building contract is placed for optional ships should be interpreted to be the date on which the original building contract to construct the series of ships is signed between the shipowner and the shipbuilder provided:

.1. the option for construction of the optional ship(s) is ultimately exercised within the period of one year after the date of the original building contract for the series of ships; and

.2. the optional ships are of the same design plans and constructed by the same shipbuilder as that for the series of ships.

3.. The application of regulations governed as described in paragraph 1, above, is to be applied as follows:

.1. if a building contract signing date occurs on or after the contract date specified for a particular set of regulation amendments, then, that set of regulation amendments applies;

.2. only in the absence of a building contract does the keel laying date criteria apply and, if a ship’s keel laying date occurs on or after the keel laying date specified for a particular set of regulation amendments, then, that set of regulation amendments applies; and

.3. regardless of the building contract signing date or keel laying date, if a ship’s delivery date occurs on or after the delivery date specified for a particular set of regulation amendments, then, that set of regulation amendments applies except in the case where the Administration has accepted that the delivery of the ships was delayed due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the shipbuilder and the owner
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-1-5 11:25 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国广东江门
好详细啊
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|标签|免责声明|龙船社区

GMT+8, 2024-9-30 16:25

Powered by Imarine

Copyright © 2006, 龙船社区

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表